In our last new media post we suggested a few easy ways to join the immigration conversation on Twitter. But Twitter is just one way to stay up-to-date and engaged with the immigration reform debate. Here are three other ways to get involved with FAIR’s immigration reform efforts today:
Facebook: Our Facebook page is an open forum where people share their thoughts about the latest immigration news ranging from state and local legislation to the Presidential candidates’ stances on border control and immigration enforcement. Start posting your questions and sharing your thoughts with our 30,000 other Facebook Page fans today.
YouTube: Our YouTube channel is frequently updated with videos of FAIR experts addressing hot topics on FOX News, CNN and MSNBC and other news channels.
Our E-Mail Newsletter: Our e-mails will give you the most comprehensive look at immigration politics and policy. Sign-up to receive action alerts, weekly legislative updates and monthly newsletters that highlight the important changes and updates from Washington, DC and across the country.
Join us in these online communities and be sure to share the links above with your friends and colleagues!
unfortunately this article does not entirely reflect the truth. the 70 year story and the 7% are not true.
just to clarify: this article is trying to fool the public by saying India gets 7% of 140000 EB visa =9800 visas only.
the actual figure from the department of state website is that india received 33600!! EB visa in 2010. that is 25% of the entire quota. not a single country in the world dreams of a similar number of employed immigrants per year.
in 2010 belgium got 226 total visas.
the visa bulletin for EB3i is 22 july 2002. estimated green card for EB3i is 16 years if they apply today. i am not sure were the 70 years came from.
this proposed bill if passed the estimated number of EB visa going to india will be at least 75000 visas (half of the quota!!) and it will improve the 16 years wait to 9 years!
just thought of correcting some of the misleading figures in this article . the 7% is just a myth to get the sympathy of people.
sorry india you can’t have it all
10/09/2011 @ 11:28AM |2,285 views
Obscure Immigration Provision Forces Some Skilled Immigrants to Wait Decades for Green Card
It is likely fewer than 100 people in America understand the provision. But we know tens of thousands of people’s lives have been made worse by it. What is this obscure provision of immigration law that affects so many but is understood by so few? It’s called the “per country limit.”
When employers recruit at U.S. universities they generally find one-half to two-thirds of the graduates in science, math and engineering fields are foreign nationals. Foreign nationals with masters degrees or higher are important contributors to product development, patent filings, startups and company expansions in America. But the per country limit results in waits of many years for green cards if they want to make their careers in America, causing many to leave – or consider leaving – and taking their skills and education with them.
Two recent reports by the National Foundation for American Policy (NFAP) explain how the per country limit – combined with the low 140,000 annual employment-based quota – could lead an Indian national applying today in the most common employment-based preference to wait up to 70 years for a green card.
The research finds the solution for skilled immigrants, ultimately, is an exemption from the green card quota for international students who graduate from a U.S. university with an advanced degree in science, technology, engineering or mathematics (STEM).
The per country limit restricts the number of green cards awarded to any one country to 7 percent of a preference category, which has a disparate impact on professionals from large countries, particularly India and China, causing them to wait longer for permanent residence than nationals of other countries. In practice, this has meant that only 2,800 Indians each year are permitted green cards annually in the employment-based third preference (EB-3).
With fewer than 3,000 Indians admitted in the category each year and an estimated potential backlog of 210,000 among Indian professionals in the category, the recent NFAP report is able to conclude an Indian sponsored today could wait 70 years for a green card. Even if the backlog of Indians in the EB-3 category were half as large, the wait time would still exceed 30 years. A Chinese immigrant sponsored today in the EB-3 category could wait two decades.
In other words, a company could file petitions for green cards on the same day for two engineers with identical credentials, one from India and the other from Belgium. Because of the per country limit, the engineer born in Belgium may receive his green card in 5 years in the employment-based third preference category (EB-3), while it could take decades for his colleague from India to receive a green card.
In the EB-2 (second preference) category, which has somewhat higher educational requirements, due to the per country limit the wait times are 6 to 8 years for a newly sponsored Indian or Chinese immigrant, but there is basically no wait for professionals from other countries.
Policymakers are starting to appreciate that no national interest is served by the U.S. government, in effect, discriminating in favor of one nationality over another. Certainly if individual employers announced they intended to limit how many people of Indian or Chinese origin they planned to hire or sponsor this year the companies would face public criticism or even legal action.
H.R. 3012, a bill by Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) and Judiciary Committee Chair Lamar Smith (R-TX), would phase out the per country limit for employment-based immigrants over a four-year period. By the fourth year the per country limit would be eliminated entirely for employment-based immigrants. The bill would also raise the per country limit on family-based immigrants from 7 percent to 15 percent, which would help those waiting the longest for green cards in family categories, particularly from Mexico and the Philippines.
H.R. 3012 is slated to be marked up in the Judiciary Committee as early as this week. In a previous Congress, a bill to eliminate the per country limit for employment-based immigrants sponsored by Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) and Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) did not become law.
Eliminating the per country limit could reduce the typical wait for Indians applying today in the EB-3 category from 70 to 12 years. While 12 years is still too long, it would be a welcome reform that would provide green cards for Indian and Chinese professionals waiting the longest (often now able to stay in the U.S. in H-1B status only due to annual waivers/renewals).
In the EB-2 (employment second preference) category, wait times would be equalized at about two to three years without regard to country of origin (as opposed to potential waits of 6 years or more for Chinese and Indian nationals in the EB-2 category).
How can we import 125,000 foreign workers eacy nonn