{"id":10770,"date":"2015-11-09T13:45:56","date_gmt":"2015-11-09T18:45:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/live-immigrationreform.pantheonsite.io\/?p=10770"},"modified":"2018-12-28T13:58:49","modified_gmt":"2018-12-28T18:58:49","slug":"washington-post-your-bias-is-showing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/2015\/11\/09\/washington-post-your-bias-is-showing\/","title":{"rendered":"Washington Post: Your Bias is Showing!"},"content":{"rendered":"
Last week I noted how commentators get confused over what on the surface appear to be contradictory statements that, when examined carefully, are not at all contradictory. One example was how a critique from the right of statements by Sen. Marco Rubio accused him of flip-flopping on the DACA amnesty for illegal aliens. I pointed out that there was no flip-flop because Rubio only supported ending DACA as long-term measure when it could be replaced by a legislated amnesty.<\/p>\n