{"id":12926,"date":"2016-06-21T14:09:10","date_gmt":"2016-06-21T18:09:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/live-immigrationreform.pantheonsite.io\/?p=12926"},"modified":"2018-12-28T13:23:17","modified_gmt":"2018-12-28T18:23:17","slug":"removals-of-foreign-nationals-who-overstay-visas-plummet-under-obama-administration","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/2016\/06\/21\/removals-of-foreign-nationals-who-overstay-visas-plummet-under-obama-administration\/","title":{"rendered":"Removals of Foreign Nationals Who Overstay Visas Plummet Under Obama Administration"},"content":{"rendered":"

Removals of visa overstayers have plummeted under the Obama administration according to a House Republican who raised the issue with Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials at a congressional hearing<\/a> last week.<\/p>\n

Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), relying on data<\/a> obtained by the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration and the National Interest, said<\/a> the Obama administration removed approximately 12,500 visa overstayers in 2009. Last year, that number dropped down to less than 2,500 \u2013 a decrease of 80 percent<\/b>.<\/p>\n

(continued below graphic)<\/p>\n

\"visa_overstay_removals3\"The Texas Republican estimated that removals of visa overstayers last year represented only one-twentieth of one percent<\/b> of the estimated five million people who overstayed their visas and remain in the country illegally.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe\u2019ve heard estimates as to the percentage of people who are here illegally as being visa overstayers,\u201d Smith said. \u201cThe percentages range from 40 percent to 68 percent. Let\u2019s take 50 percent. Let\u2019s take 10 million people in the country illegally, half are here because of visa overstayers and are in illegal status.\u201d<\/p>\n

He continued, \u201cYou\u2019ve got five million people now in illegal status because they\u2019re visa overstayers. The administration [removed]2,500 of those. That\u2019s one-twentieth of one percent. That sounds to me like an extension of the administration\u2019s amnesty program.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWe utilize our prioritization scheme along with the resources that we have,\u201d Craig Healy, Assistant Director for National Security Investigations at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, said as he attempted to defend the administration\u2019s non-enforcement agenda.<\/p>\n

However, Smith was not satisfied by Healy\u2019s explanation, pointing out that if the administration wanted to enforce the law against those who overstay their visas, then they would have asked for more money in their budget requests.<\/p>\n

\u201cI understand that, but the administration stands convicted by their own actions by the facts, why haven\u2019t they requested more money in their budget if they wanted to send more individuals home?\u201d he asked, \u201cThey have not requested the money sufficiently to do so.\u201d<\/p>\n

The administration\u2019s unwillingness to enforce the law by allowing visa overstayers to remain in the country illegally has alarmed the American people. A poll<\/a> released earlier this year indicates that approximately 3 out of 4 Americans want to remove those who overstay their visas. The same poll indicates that 68 percent of Americans consider visa overstayers a \u201cserious national security risk.\u201d These concerns are not unfounded, as several 9\/11 hijackers overstayed their visas and terror groups around the world have recently threatened to exploit the U.S. visa program to harm Americans.<\/p>\n

When immigration changes are proposed within the context of national security, the debate usually revolves around the issue of border control. However, gaining control over our borders deals with only part of the illegal immigration problem because it obscures the issue of the overstayers. Both Congress and the federal government must recognize that visa overstayers pose considerable national security risks and move swiftly to ensure implementation of the entry-exit tracking system that was mandated<\/a> by Congress nearly twenty years ago. Until then, the administration should abandon its narrow removal priorities that exclude nearly all visa overstayers from any type of enforcement.