{"id":1295,"date":"2012-04-19T15:53:24","date_gmt":"2012-04-19T19:53:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/live-immigrationreform.pantheonsite.io\/?p=1295"},"modified":"2016-02-23T14:08:58","modified_gmt":"2016-02-23T19:08:58","slug":"fair-previews-arizona-sb-1070-supreme-court-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/2012\/04\/19\/fair-previews-arizona-sb-1070-supreme-court-case\/","title":{"rendered":"FAIR Previews Arizona SB 1070 Supreme Court Case"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On Wednesday, April 25, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on <em>Arizona v. United States of America<\/em>, the case that will decide the fate of SB 1070, Arizona\u2019s immigration enforcement law.  To help guide our members through the hearing, FAIR\u2019s Government Relations Department just released a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fairus.org\/DocServer\/SB1070_041912.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">summary of the arguments<\/a> both parties submitted in briefs to the Court. <\/p>\n<p>FAIR\u2019s summary looks at the four sections that the Department of Justice has challenged as well as the arguments Arizona has made in support of its law and the arguments the Department of Justice has made in an attempt to strike it down. Click <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fairus.org\/DocServer\/SB1070_041912.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a> to download the document and get the details to prepare for the outcome of this landmark case.   <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On Wednesday, April 25, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Arizona v. United States of America, the case that will decide the fate of SB 1070, Arizona\u2019s immigration enforcement law. To help guide our members through the hearing, FAIR\u2019s Government Relations Department just released a summary of the arguments both parties submitted in<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/2012\/04\/19\/fair-previews-arizona-sb-1070-supreme-court-case\/\" title=\"Read More\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":26,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[5,3,1513,11,6,4,10,7,14],"tags":[175],"yst_prominent_words":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1295"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/26"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1295"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1295\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1298,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1295\/revisions\/1298"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1295"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1295"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1295"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=1295"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}