{"id":13251,"date":"2016-09-29T15:49:07","date_gmt":"2016-09-29T19:49:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/live-immigrationreform.pantheonsite.io\/?p=13251"},"modified":"2018-12-28T13:14:04","modified_gmt":"2018-12-28T18:14:04","slug":"the-important-difference-between-assimilation-and-integration","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/2016\/09\/29\/the-important-difference-between-assimilation-and-integration\/","title":{"rendered":"The Important Difference Between Assimilation and Integration"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"StatueControversial London mayor Sadiq Khan<\/a> recently toured the United States in support of presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Commenting on U.S. immigration policy, Mr. Khan said<\/a>, \u201cPeople shouldn\u2019t have to drop their cultures and traditions when they arrive in our cities and countries.\u201d He also stated that he believes in \u201cintegration\u201d rather than \u201cassimilation.\u201d<\/p>\n

Mr. Khan, who is from an immigrant family, raises an interesting point. What is the difference between \u201cintegration\u201d and \u201cassimilation\u201d?<\/p>\n

Assimilation<\/a> is generally defined as adopting the ways of another culture and fully becoming part of a different society. Whereas integration<\/a> is typically defined as incorporating individuals from different groups into a society as equals. The difference is subtle but significant.<\/p>\n

When immigrants assimilate, they accept the ways of their host and become a full part of the community.\u00a0 Assimilation implies that immigrants, through education and experience, can earn their way into the host culture and be seamlessly accepted as full members of their new community.<\/p>\n

By contrast, integration suggests boundaries. It is defined in terms of equality. But in this context equality indicates that a host is obligated to embrace foreign cultures as equal, even when they conflict with the values and traditions of the host.<\/p>\n

Integration may sound wonderful, but this isn\u2019t always the case. Imagine the chaos that would result if a mass migration of Britons insisted the United States integrate their tradition of driving on the left side of the road, rather than assimilating to the American preference for the right side. That\u2019s an amusing example. But the situation becomes dire if one considers the wider implications of integration over assimilation \u2013 especially when mass migration is from countries where polygamy, child labor or slavery is considered acceptable.<\/p>\n

Despite Mr. Kahn\u2019s assertions to the contrary, people are not required to drop their cultures and traditions when they arrive in the United States. What American doesn\u2019t know crowds of people who maintain some connection to another culture? Apparently Mr. Khan has never attended a St. Patrick\u2019s Day parade in Boston, or a Dominican Day festival in New York City. In fact, the happy acceptance of foreign folkways is a uniquely American value.<\/p>\n

But immigrants to the U.S. are expected to learn enough about American culture to be able to obey the law and participate in the commercial and civic life of the nation. This is a reasonable expectation. Assimilation cultivates success for newcomers and prevents the head-on collisions that result when everyone drives in opposite directions on the same side of the road. Most importantly, it\u2019s what turns immigrants into Americans.