{"id":14720,"date":"2017-08-02T16:06:56","date_gmt":"2017-08-02T20:06:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/live-immigrationreform.pantheonsite.io\/?p=14720"},"modified":"2018-12-28T12:42:11","modified_gmt":"2018-12-28T17:42:11","slug":"wall-street-journal-fellow-travelers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/2017\/08\/02\/wall-street-journal-fellow-travelers\/","title":{"rendered":"The Wall Street Journal and Its Fellow Travelers"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Wall Street Journal\u2019s shaky standing<\/a> on immigration slipped again this week when it employed outdated data and a nonsensical argument to bemoan the latest migrant deaths<\/a> along America\u2019s southern border.<\/p>\n

The Journal\u2019s editorial, \u201cThe Body Count at the Border<\/a>,\u201d cried crocodile tears over the \u201cbroken U.S. immigration system.\u201d It then misdiagnosed the problem by 180 degrees.<\/p>\n

Citing a report from the National Foundation for American Policy<\/a>, the newspaper noted that the number of deaths along the Mexican border \u201cincreased by about 80 percent between 1999 and 2012, even as apprehensions plummeted by more than 75 percent.\u201d<\/p>\n

Ignoring the commonsense conclusion that reduced enforcement opens the door to more chaos, carnage and death, NFAP and the editorialists advocate less restrictive immigration laws and endless work visas.<\/p>\n

The Journal should do a better job of vetting its sources. NFAP, which ginned up the \u201c7,000 Deaths and Counting<\/a>\u201d report, presents itself as a \u201cnon-partisan organization dedicated to public policy research on immigration.\u201d Do not confuse non-partisan with non-biased.<\/p>\n

NFAP executive director Stuart Anderson was formerly director of trade and immigration studies at the libertarian Cato Institute, an open-borders shop also frequently used by Journal commentators. The Board of Advisors includes:<\/p>\n