{"id":14720,"date":"2017-08-02T16:06:56","date_gmt":"2017-08-02T20:06:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/live-immigrationreform.pantheonsite.io\/?p=14720"},"modified":"2018-12-28T12:42:11","modified_gmt":"2018-12-28T17:42:11","slug":"wall-street-journal-fellow-travelers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/2017\/08\/02\/wall-street-journal-fellow-travelers\/","title":{"rendered":"The Wall Street Journal and Its Fellow Travelers"},"content":{"rendered":"
The Wall Street Journal\u2019s shaky standing<\/a> on immigration slipped again this week when it employed outdated data and a nonsensical argument to bemoan the latest migrant deaths<\/a> along America\u2019s southern border.<\/p>\n The Journal\u2019s editorial, \u201cThe Body Count at the Border<\/a>,\u201d cried crocodile tears over the \u201cbroken U.S. immigration system.\u201d It then misdiagnosed the problem by 180 degrees.<\/p>\n Citing a report from the National Foundation for American Policy<\/a>, the newspaper noted that the number of deaths along the Mexican border \u201cincreased by about 80 percent between 1999 and 2012, even as apprehensions plummeted by more than 75 percent.\u201d<\/p>\n Ignoring the commonsense conclusion that reduced enforcement opens the door to more chaos, carnage and death, NFAP and the editorialists advocate less restrictive immigration laws and endless work visas.<\/p>\n The Journal should do a better job of vetting its sources. NFAP, which ginned up the \u201c7,000 Deaths and Counting<\/a>\u201d report, presents itself as a \u201cnon-partisan organization dedicated to public policy research on immigration.\u201d Do not confuse non-partisan with non-biased.<\/p>\n NFAP executive director Stuart Anderson was formerly director of trade and immigration studies at the libertarian Cato Institute, an open-borders shop also frequently used by Journal commentators. The Board of Advisors includes:<\/p>\n Instead of relying on immigration dilettantes, globalists and special-interest pleaders, the Journal would serve its readers better by listening to Thomas Homan, on the front lines at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.<\/p>\n Amid a proliferation of \u201csanctuary\u201d cities \u2013 not once mentioned in NFAP\u2019s dated report — Homan is considering charging local officials under anti-smuggling laws<\/a>. That would give added punch to the financial sanctions<\/a> recommended by U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions.<\/p>\n Insofar as sanctuary policies abet human trafficking and invite more illegal border crossings, resolute enforcement of federal law is crucial to fixing America\u2019s \u201cbroken immigration system.\u201d Anything else is political pandering that needlessly endangers lives. \n