st<\/sup> century issue, equating the early years of our republic, when it was being settled, with today\u2019s about 325 million population is inane.<\/p>\nKane equates population size with military power. That is similarly inane. Otherwise why would anyone care about Iraq\u2019s nuclear program? Or, why wouldn\u2019t Israel have been destroyed by it more populated neighbors?<\/p>\n
The writer calculated that today\u2019s country would be less populated by 100 million if immigration had been half of the actual number of arrivals. What that factoid should suggest is a number of benefits, not deficits. Some of the benefits if immigration had been more moderate would be:<\/p>\n
\n- \u00a0Cities that today are bursting at their seams would be more livable;<\/li>\n
- \u00a0The garbage dumps and landfills and garbage scows would be having less impact on the environment; and<\/li>\n
- \u00a0Our voracious consumption of non-renewable natural resources would be less threatening the future.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n