{"id":16694,"date":"2018-03-21T14:20:41","date_gmt":"2018-03-21T18:20:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/live-immigrationreform.pantheonsite.io\/?p=16694"},"modified":"2018-12-28T10:43:45","modified_gmt":"2018-12-28T15:43:45","slug":"scrubbing-english-language-meaning-chain-migration-now-offensive-term","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/2018\/03\/21\/scrubbing-english-language-meaning-chain-migration-now-offensive-term\/","title":{"rendered":"Scrubbing the English Language of Meaning: \u201cChain Migration\u201d Now an Offensive Term"},"content":{"rendered":"

Next to the American public, which has been saddled with enormous costs and needless tragedies due to our failed immigration policies, the English language has been the greatest victim of the immigration debate. As all successful propagandists throughout history have known, controlling language is key to controlling minds. The rancorous political climate in general, and the debate about immigration policy in particular, are examples of how language, rather than ideas, are driving policy.<\/span><\/p>\n

Terms like \u201cillegal alien\u201d (a proper legal definition of foreign nationals who are in the country without permission), or \u201camnesty\u201d (a clear description of a policy that forgives lawbreakers for their violations), to name just two, can no longer be used in polite company or appear on the pages of leading newspapers. The next target of the immigration thought police is \u201cchain migration\u201d \u2013 a term first devised by demographers and sociologists to describe the phenomenon of family members or neighbors who follow one another from their place of origin to a new country or a new city.<\/span><\/p>\n

Accuracy, of course, is the mortal enemy of propaganda. As such, the people who want to preserve an immigration system based on having one relative sponsor the next relative \u2013 or, dare we say, chain migration \u2013 now want to scrub that term as well. For the record, a mere 16 percent of American voters<\/span><\/a> think that chain migration is a good policy, so the only way for them to prevail over basic commonsense is to make basic commonsense toxic.<\/span><\/p>\n