{"id":21235,"date":"2019-03-13T16:03:38","date_gmt":"2019-03-13T20:03:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/live-immigrationreform.pantheonsite.io\/?p=21235"},"modified":"2019-03-13T16:03:41","modified_gmt":"2019-03-13T20:03:41","slug":"the-aclus-radical-anti-ice-campaign-immigrationreform-com","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/2019\/03\/13\/the-aclus-radical-anti-ice-campaign-immigrationreform-com\/","title":{"rendered":"The ACLU\u2019s Radical Anti-ICE Campaign"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
The American Civil Liberties Union<\/a> (ACLU) has taken its campaign of endless harassment against the Department of Homeland Security to a whole new level of insanity. What\u2019s the ACLU throwing a hissy-fit<\/a> about this time? <\/p>\n\n\n\n According to Tech Crunch<\/a><\/em>, the ACLU filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request and received documents indicating that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) purchased access to a commercial database that allows policing agencies to flag license plates and receive an alert when those plates are caught on traffic cameras. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It is not clear why this revelation required a FOIA action,\nsince federal agencies are required by law to publish a Privacy Impact\nAssessment (PIA) any time they begin using a new data source. And the Tech Crunch<\/em> piece specifically notes\nthat ICE did, in fact, publish several PIA\u2019s during its negotiations with the\ndatabase service provider.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Nevertheless, according to the ACLU, ICE\u2019s \u201cexploitation\u201d of\nlicense plate information raises \u201cprivacy concerns\u201d and \u201cviolates immigration\nsanctuary laws.\u201d The ACLU also makes the absurd assertion that ICE is\nattempting to circumvent proper \u201coversight\u201d when it calls police departments\nand asks them for \u201clocally collected driver location data.\u201d (Funny, we thought\nthat was called investigation<\/em> \u2013 and\nit\u2019s exactly what federal law enforcement agents are paid to do.) <\/p>\n\n\n\n But there are two key problems with the ACLU\u2019s legal\nanalysis:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Translated into plain English, that means the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Of course, the ACLU isn\u2019t remotely interested in what the law actually says<\/a>. Rather, the organization is interested in promoting its bogus narrative that ICE<\/a> is \u201can immoral and rogue agency.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n It does not appear that the ACLU has filed any lawsuits in connection with ICE\u2019s use of license plate data. However, when it inevitably does, its preposterous legal arguments<\/a> are tailor made to prove alluring to the activist judges on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals<\/a> \u2013 which has an established history of creating \u201cimmigrants\u2019 rights\u201d out of jurisprudential smoke and fog.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has taken its campaign of endless harassment against the Department of Homeland Security to a whole new level of insanity. What\u2019s the ACLU throwing a hissy-fit about this time? According to Tech Crunch, the ACLU filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request and received documents indicating that U.S.<\/p>\n