{"id":21670,"date":"2019-07-03T13:07:24","date_gmt":"2019-07-03T17:07:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/?p=21670"},"modified":"2019-07-03T13:12:03","modified_gmt":"2019-07-03T17:12:03","slug":"a-fine-strategy-making-deportable-fugitives-pay","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/2019\/07\/03\/a-fine-strategy-making-deportable-fugitives-pay\/","title":{"rendered":"A Fine Strategy? Making Deportable Fugitives Pay"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Immigration\nattorneys are in an uproar because U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is levying fines on illegal aliens<\/a> who have deportation orders.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A\nmore reasonable reaction: Why wasn\u2019t this tried years ago?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly a\nhalf-million illegal aliens in the U.S. had outstanding deportation orders in\n2018 and were classified as fugitives, according to ICE. The Immigration and Nationality Act<\/a> grants ICE the authority\nto impose civil fines on illegally present aliens who have been ordered removed\nor failed to voluntarily depart. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

One headline-grabbing ICE notice<\/a> went to a fugitive holed\nup in a \u201csanctuary church\u201d in Ohio. The June 25 letter informed Edith Espinal\nMoreno of the agency\u2019s intention to fine her $497,777.  An immigration judge had ordered Espinal, 42,\nremoved from the country two years ago.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rosa Ortez Cruz\n— another church-dwelling, fugitive — received a notice that ICE intends to\nfine her $314,007 for having \u201cconnived or conspired\u201d to avoid deportation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Immigration attorneys and their dodgy clients could\nafford to wait out the government before President Donald Trump entered office.\n\u201cMost were spared deportation under the Obama\nadministration because they had U.S.-born children or no criminal records,\u201d the\nWashington\nPost<\/a> observed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Now, with fines running as\nmuch as $800 per day, the cost of flouting deportation orders is getting\nserious. Federal authorities started assessing penalties in December, and ICE\nis right to use every legal tool at its disposal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In theory, monetary threats are an incentive for\nillegally present aliens to clear out of the country. Yet it\u2019s unclear how the\nadministration will enforce collection from elusive, no-account migrants. ICE\nhas not disclosed if any fines have actually been paid.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Noting indigent cases like Espinal and Ortez, we\nwouldn\u2019t be shocked to see more than a few demand letters bouncing back to ICE,\nstamped \u201cReturn to Sender.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Still, the primary and ultimate goal remains: to finally remove those 500,000 deportable fugitives, whether they pay a fine or not. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

To that point, President Trump announced this week that the ICE enforcement action<\/a> initially scheduled for last month to target up to 2,000 illegal alien households in 10 major cities will begin over the Fourth of July holiday. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Immigration attorneys are in an uproar because U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is levying fines on illegal aliens who have deportation orders. A more reasonable reaction: Why wasn\u2019t this tried years ago? Roughly a half-million illegal aliens in the U.S. had outstanding deportation orders in 2018 and were classified as fugitives, according to ICE. The<\/p>\n

Read More<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":10961,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[1513],"tags":[913,47,71,3102,6032],"yst_prominent_words":[2019,4378,2505,5145,1995,6029,6030,6028,6031,1918,2013,2008,2443,6026,6025,1963,5855,4517,6027,1939],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21670"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21670"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21670\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21672,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21670\/revisions\/21672"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10961"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21670"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21670"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21670"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=21670"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}