{"id":21876,"date":"2019-08-30T12:03:36","date_gmt":"2019-08-30T16:03:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/?p=21876"},"modified":"2019-08-30T12:07:01","modified_gmt":"2019-08-30T16:07:01","slug":"elizabeth-warren-jobs-immigration","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/2019\/08\/30\/elizabeth-warren-jobs-immigration\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Economic Patriot\u2019 Elizabeth Warren Misses the Mark on Jobs"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Democratic presidential contender Elizabeth\nWarren is blasting U.S. companies that ship jobs abroad while the self-styled\n\u201ceconomic patriot\u201d leaves the door wide open for illegal aliens to work here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cA lot of giant companies\nrefer to themselves as \u2018American.\u2019 But let\u2019s face it, they only have one real\nloyalty: Their shareholders. A Warren administration will halt the hollowing\nout of American cities and create good American jobs,\u2019\u2019 Warren tweeted<\/a> this week.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Massachusetts senator\nsingled out Levi Strauss, General Electric and \u201cthe maker of the famous No. 2\npencil\u201d for moving jobs out of the U.S. She\u2019s not wrong about that.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Warren also assailed\nWashington, D.C., politicians who \u201callow companies to call the shots on trade\nagreements and the tax code.\u201d She\u2019s not wrong about that either.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But in failing to address\nimmigration and border security, Warren is only half right, and her allegedly patriotic\nagenda collapses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For all her bold hyperbole\nabout protecting American jobs, the senator has been unclear<\/a> and evasive about her position on E-Verify<\/a>, the government\u2019s internet-based system that vets\napplicants\u2019 eligibility to work in this country legally. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Without mandatory E-Verify screening<\/a>, the U.S. remains a jobs magnet for low-wage\nillegal workers. The presence of so much cheap labor drives down the wages that\nemployers are willing to pay American employees. In 2017, the Pew Research Center<\/a> estimated 7.6 million illegal aliens were in the U.S. civilian\nworkforce. <\/strong>That figure would surely rise in a Warren\nadministration.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

NumbersUSA<\/a>, a group that advocates for immigration enforcement, rates Sen.\nWarren\u2019s voting record as \u201cabysmal\u201d when it comes to opposing work permits for\nillegal workers. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Even liberal Mother Jones<\/a>\nmagazine called Warren\u2019s immigration policy \u201cde facto open borders.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIt recommends no actions to improve border law\nenforcement in any way. There\u2019s nothing about either a wall or a \u2018virtual\nwall.\u2019 There\u2019s nothing about E-Verify. There\u2019s nothing about \u2018smarter\u2019 or \u2018more\nefficient\u2019 enforcement. No one will ever be deported \u2014 except, presumably, for\nserious felons, though Warren doesn\u2019t even say that explicitly,\u201d Mother Jones\nconcluded.\n\nWarren\ncan bash American business all she wants. But it\u2019s all sound and fury\nsignifying nothing as long as her immigration positions continue to give\nillegal aliens a free pass at great cost to legal U.S. workers.\n\n\n\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Democratic presidential contender Elizabeth Warren is blasting U.S. companies that ship jobs abroad while the self-styled \u201ceconomic patriot\u201d leaves the door wide open for illegal aliens to work here. \u201cA lot of giant companies refer to themselves as \u2018American.\u2019 But let\u2019s face it, they only have one real loyalty: Their shareholders. A Warren administration will<\/p>\n

Read More<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":21877,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[548,11],"tags":[1558,1710,1185],"yst_prominent_words":[2122,2019,1938,6463,2173,2017,1995,2013,2008,3768,1963,2137,6464,3287,2217,1939,2213,2128,1937,6465],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21876"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21876"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21876\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21878,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21876\/revisions\/21878"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/21877"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21876"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21876"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21876"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=21876"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}