{"id":23079,"date":"2020-06-10T14:46:41","date_gmt":"2020-06-10T18:46:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/?p=23079"},"modified":"2020-06-10T14:46:44","modified_gmt":"2020-06-10T18:46:44","slug":"abolish-ice-antifa-hypocrisy-immigrationreform-com","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/2020\/06\/10\/abolish-ice-antifa-hypocrisy-immigrationreform-com\/","title":{"rendered":"Antifa Builds Border Wall and Recruits Armed Border Patrol"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Antifa<\/a> and many of the other groups now calling on political leaders to \u201cdefund the police\u201d were also at the forefront of the \u201cAbolish ICE<\/a>\u201d movement \u2013 insisting that the federal government abolish U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In June of 2018, a Nebraska affiliate<\/a> of the group doxxed roughly 1,600 ICE employees, making public their titles, photos, home addresses and information about their family members. And, in September 2018, Antifa agitator Ulrike Salazar<\/a> called ICE agents “shadowy Gestapo agents” who “take away young boys and girls, tear apart families, throw away undesirables into dark and cramped dungeons.” Clearly, Antifa is an organization that hates borders and border enforcement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Of course, that appears to be true only when\nborders aren\u2019t serving the group\u2019s radical political agenda. When borders\ndelineate a zone in which Antifa has become the de facto <\/em>governing authority, its thugs have no problem engaging in\na rough justice form of border enforcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As The Gateway Pundit<\/a> <\/em>reports, Antifa has taken over six square blocks in the Capitol Hill district of Seattle, declaring it an \u201cautonomous zone,\u201d no longer subject to state and federal laws. And what\u2019s the first thing the new Lords of the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone (CHAZ) did? They built a border wall out of Jersey barriers and called for armed volunteers to police it. Hypocrisy much?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What\u2019s worse is that the supposed anti-fascists appear to be using fascist tactics in order to subdue the residents of the Capitol Hill neighborhood. In an opinion column, Australia\u2019s Daily Telegraph<\/a><\/em> has suggested that, in the absence of Seattle authorities, residents have been intimidated into cooperating with Antifa.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The situation in Seattle should conclusively\ndemonstrate \u2013 even to the casual observer \u2013 that borders, border walls and\nborder enforcement are prerequisites to implementing and maintaining a specific\npolitical order. Were the Seattle city government still in charge of the\nCapitol Hill district, Antifa simply wouldn\u2019t be able to make a credible claim\nthat new rules are in force. The only way to ensure that those rules remain the\nlaw of Antifa\u2019s very tiny land is to keep out any other entity with the power\nto govern.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And that\u2019s exactly why Antifa and its allies want to abolish ICE. It has absolutely nothing to do with concern for the \u201crights\u201d of illegal aliens. Erasing the borders of the United States would mean that we no longer have a clearly delineated territory within which the American rule of law<\/a> reigns supreme. And that, in turn, would create an opportunity for groups like Antifa to claim they\u2019re free to impose a new political order. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since most Americans don\u2019t want to live under the\nboot heel of any extremist group, \u201cAbolish ICE\u201d isn\u2019t just a catchy political\nslogan. It\u2019s a dangerous idea with dire real-world consequences.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Antifa and many of the other groups now calling on political leaders to \u201cdefund the police\u201d were also at the forefront of the \u201cAbolish ICE\u201d movement \u2013 insisting that the federal government abolish U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). In June of 2018, a Nebraska affiliate of the group doxxed roughly 1,600 ICE employees, making<\/p>\n

Read More<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":52,"featured_media":17428,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[3],"tags":[1894,8920,1524,1887],"yst_prominent_words":[5390,3264,8912,8919,8914,2043,3626,2433,8916,8911,8910,1995,4528,8915,1918,3792,2045,8913,8917,8918],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23079"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/52"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23079"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23079\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23080,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23079\/revisions\/23080"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17428"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23079"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23079"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23079"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=23079"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}