{"id":2511,"date":"2013-02-13T11:25:31","date_gmt":"2013-02-13T15:25:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/live-immigrationreform.pantheonsite.io\/?p=2511"},"modified":"2015-07-30T15:55:50","modified_gmt":"2015-07-30T19:55:50","slug":"dhs_one_public_charge","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/2013\/02\/13\/dhs_one_public_charge\/","title":{"rendered":"DHS Only Acted Against ONE Public Charge Last Year"},"content":{"rendered":"

Tech Lobby Endorses Amnesty<\/h3>\n

“Silicon Valley executives, who have long pressed the government to provide more visas for foreign-born math and science brains, are joining forces with an array of immigration groups seeking comprehensive changes in the law. And as momentum builds in Washington for a broad revamping, the tech industry has more hope than ever that it will finally achieve its goal: the expanded access to visas that it says is critical to its own continued growth and that of the economy as a whole,” the New York Times<\/a> says.<\/p>\n

Obama’s Zero Sum Approach to Amnesty<\/p>\n

“Anyone hoping to hear a more conciliatory speech than the inaugural address must have been disappointed to hear an equally argumentative President deliver this year\u2019s State of the Union Address. Oblivious to a Republican-controlled House of Representatives, the president ticked off a laundry list of lofty progressive goals that are sure to placate his liberal base, but have little chance of being signed into law,” says Israel Ortega in Human Events<\/a>.<\/p>\n

“Add immigration reform to the list unless the president drops his insistence on dealing with immigration policy in one gargantuan comprehensive bill.”<\/p>\n

DHS Only Acted Against ONE Public Charge Last Year<\/h3>\n

“In a response letter to four top Republican lawmakers, the Department of Homeland Security revealed it only initiated one case against an immigrant for becoming a ‘public charge,’ or being primarily dependent upon the government, in fiscal year 2012. The case was later withdrawn,” the Daily Caller<\/a> says.<\/p>\n

“While the department\u2019s response to Republican Sens. Jeff Sessions, Chuck Grassley, Orrin Hatch and Pat Roberts\u2019 August oversight request offered an overview of the centuries-old federal public-charge restrictions, it noticeably avoided several of the senators\u2019 direct questions and demonstrated potentially significant inadequacies in record-keeping by immigration officials, who legally should be enforcing public-charge rules for immigrants both inside and outside of the country.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Tech Lobby Endorses Amnesty “Silicon Valley executives, who have long pressed the government to provide more visas for foreign-born math and science brains, are joining forces with an array of immigration groups seeking comprehensive changes in the law. And as momentum builds in Washington for a broad revamping, the tech industry has more hope than<\/p>\n

Read More<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[3,4],"tags":[1496,261],"yst_prominent_words":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2511"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2511"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2511\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2513,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2511\/revisions\/2513"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2511"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2511"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2511"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=2511"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}