Last week was undeniably a bad one for those of us who believe\nin the rule of law and the value of American citizenship. The open-borders crowd chalked up two big\nwins. The first in Maryland where the state legislature overrode Governor Larry\nHogan’s veto of a sanctuary state bill. The next in New York City where the\ncity council passed legislation to allow non-citizens to vote in local\nelections. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
So these fights are over and lost and it\u2019s time to move onto\nthe next ones, right?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Nope. This was just\nround one. We can still win if we don\u2019t give up. Obviously\nlitigation is a possibility, but as we\nhave seen in recent years, the ideological views of activist judges often carry\nthe day. However, it\u2019s also possible to put these\nissues on the ballot and let the voters decide. While not easy and not a slam\ndunk, the public does have the power to overrule the politicians. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
In Maryland, a statewide ballot question<\/a> (veto referendum) can\u2019t create new laws, but it can repeal ones that were recently enacted. To get a referendum on the ballot requires 3 percent of the total number of votes cast for\u00a0governor\u00a0in the preceding election. This means 69,135 validated and signed petitions would be required to get the referendum on the ballot and have Marylanders vote on the repeal of the sanctuary law, a truly attainable number.\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n\n\n The catch in Maryland is the time crunch. Under Article XVI<\/a> of the state constitution, a third of the required number of petition signatures must be received by the Secretary of State before June 1 of next year, and the remainder by June 30.\u00a0 With the tight timeframe, it would be very helpful for Gov. Hogan to quickly show strong support for a possible referendum. \u00a0He has a strong statewide job approval<\/a>\u00a0 rating.\u00a0 In addition, the legislature overrode his veto of a bill he described as a<\/a> \u201cdangerous precedent.\u201d His early efforts would be important to attaining the number of validated signatures needed for the referendum to qualify for the ballot.<\/p>\n\n\n\n To get an amendment to the New York City Charter placed on\nthe ballot requires valid signatures from 10 percent of the total number of\nregistered voters in the city who cast votes for governor in the last\nelection. Once the requisite signatures are\ngathered, the petition would be presented to the city council. The council can then choose to adopt it\nrather than requiring it to be placed on the ballot. If the city council doesn\u2019t adopt the\npetition, the signatures of an additional 5 percent of registered voters must\nbe gathered to qualify it for the ballot. Since slightly over two million votes\nwere cast for governor in New York City in 2018, just over 200,000 signatures\nwould need to be gathered to present the petition to the council. If the council doesn\u2019t adopt the petition\n(which is the likely scenario since it passed non-citizen voting 33-14 in the\nfirst place), an additional 100,000 signatures would be needed. <\/p>\n\n\n\n While these numbers sound huge, there are roughly 700,000 registered Republican voters\u00a0 in New York City. Moreover, given that nine Democrat members of the city council also voted against the non-citizen voting bill, there would undoubtedly be many eager supporters among the city\u2019s more than 2.3 million registered Democrats.\u00a0 Even the pro-amnesty former Mayor Mike Bloomberg recently opposed<\/a> allowing foreign nationals to vote.\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n\n\n Both these fights aren\u2019t guaranteed victories, but they are winnable.\u00a0 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Last week was undeniably a bad one for those of us who believe in the rule of law and the value of American citizenship. The open-borders crowd chalked up two big wins. The first in Maryland where the state legislature overrode Governor Larry Hogan’s veto of a sanctuary state bill. The next in New York<\/p>\n