{"id":2531,"date":"2013-02-19T11:27:50","date_gmt":"2013-02-19T15:27:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/live-immigrationreform.pantheonsite.io\/?p=2531"},"modified":"2017-08-14T08:47:53","modified_gmt":"2017-08-14T12:47:53","slug":"steve-deace-et-tu-rand-paul","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/2013\/02\/19\/steve-deace-et-tu-rand-paul\/","title":{"rendered":"Steve Deace – Et Tu, Rand Paul?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Steve Deace – Et Tu, Rand Paul?<\/h3>\n

“Likely fellow 2016 GOP presidential rival Marco Rubio has taken some heat from the conservative grassroots for being the face of “comprehensive immigration reform” (or what many conservatives call amnesty). Now it appears Rand Paul is going to the left of Rubio on this issue if you read his column in The Washington Times,” says Steve Deace<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The entire premise of Rand’s piece is what’s best and fair for the illegal aliens and never discusses what’s best and fair for the people here legally, paying taxes, and paying the freight for those who aren’t.<\/p>\n

Gang of 8 Plan A Security Nightmare<\/h3>\n

“While the Democratic Party has been most often seen as the party that was eager to enable and encourage millions of aliens, including illegal aliens, to enter the United States, the reality is that both Democrats and Republicans see significant gains to be achieved by opening America\u2019s borders to aliens from around the world, irrespective of how they enter the United States,” says Michael Cutler at GOPUSA.com.<\/p>\n

“[I]t is impossible to understand how the Gang of Eight has utterly ignored the fact that there is virtually no integrity to the process by which aliens are granted lawful status and U.S. citizenship under the current circumstances. Aliens who are applying to participate in the \u201cDREAM Act\u201d program cobbled together by the President without the consent of Congress are not being interviewed in person.”<\/p>\n

Jan Ting – Say No to Another Amnesty<\/h3>\n

“The so-called comprehensive immigration reform proposed by a group of senators and President Obama amounts to immediate amnesty for millions of immigration-law violators, and the lifting of limits on future immigration, with some window dressing designed to assuage skeptical voters. We’ve seen this act before,” says law professor Jan C. Ting.<\/p>\n

“The 1986 amnesty promised to fix the immigration problem by granting amnesty to three million immigration-law violators, strengthening the border, and penalizing employers for hiring illegal immigrants. It didn’t work then, and it won’t work now.”<\/p>\n

Fitton – Don’t Be Fooled by Deceptive Amnesty Claims<\/h3>\n

“More than a few Republicans in the United States Senate seem to have contracted a severe case of what Harry Truman called “Potomac Fever\u201d (wanting to go along to get along in Washington). Apparently still trembling from the recent election debacle, they have cobbled together a deceptive and destructive “bipartisan\u201d compromise on illegal alien amnesty,” says Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch<\/a>.<\/p>\n

“There is no question that the Senate plan is unjust. Illegal aliens have broken our laws, and they shouldn’t be rewarded with amnesty and immediate legalization. Here’s something else: Simply talking about providing a “pathway to citizenship\u201d is only going to worsen the already out-of-control illegal immigration crisis by inducing greater numbers of illegal aliens to flood across the border to take advantage of the program.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Steve Deace – Et Tu, Rand Paul? “Likely fellow 2016 GOP presidential rival Marco Rubio has taken some heat from the conservative grassroots for being the face of “comprehensive immigration reform” (or what many conservatives call amnesty). Now it appears Rand Paul is going to the left of Rubio on this issue if you read<\/p>\n

Read More<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[5,6],"tags":[34,975],"yst_prominent_words":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2531"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2531"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2531\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14866,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2531\/revisions\/14866"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2531"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2531"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2531"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=2531"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}