{"id":25926,"date":"2022-12-19T15:02:08","date_gmt":"2022-12-19T20:02:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/2022\/12\/19\/human-traffickers-and-immigration-fraudsters-have-a-consistent-ally-the-radical-ninth-circuit\/"},"modified":"2022-12-19T15:02:08","modified_gmt":"2022-12-19T20:02:08","slug":"human-traffickers-and-immigration-fraudsters-have-a-consistent-ally-the-radical-ninth-circuit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/2022\/12\/19\/human-traffickers-and-immigration-fraudsters-have-a-consistent-ally-the-radical-ninth-circuit\/","title":{"rendered":"Human Traffickers and Immigration Fraudsters Have a Consistent Ally: The Radical Ninth Circuit"},"content":{"rendered":"

In 2020, the Supreme Court handed down a decision, in U.S. v. Sineneng Smith, affirming that it is a crime to encourage illegal immigration. The ruling reversed a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision that, in SCOTUS\u2019s view, had acted prematurely. If the Ninth Circuit\u2019s decision had remained in force, an important law that allows punishment for criminal scammers who routinely destroy others\u2019 lives would have been struck down. Unfortunately for the Americans and foreigners victimized by these scammers, activist lawyers seem determined to let them defraud the public freely and the issue is headed to the highest court once again.<\/p>\n

To read the rest of the article click here<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In 2020, the Supreme Court handed down a decision, in U.S. v. Sineneng Smith, affirming that it is a crime to encourage illegal immigration. The ruling reversed a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision that, in SCOTUS\u2019s view, had acted prematurely. If the Ninth Circuit\u2019s decision had remained in force, an important law that allows<\/p>\n

Read More<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":25925,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[1450],"tags":[],"yst_prominent_words":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25926"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25926"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25926\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/25925"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25926"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25926"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25926"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=25926"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}