“The Senate Judiciary Committee is just beginning its markup of the bipartisan immigration bill, but already opponents and supporters of the sweeping legislation are fighting over which immigrants should be allowed to legalize their status and which should be deported,” the LA Times says in an editorial<\/a>.<\/p>\n “Clearly it makes sense to refuse legal status to immigrants who have been convicted of serious crimes. But some lawmakers, including Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), are backing a provision that goes too far, excluding immigrants who have no criminal history simply because their names appear in a database of gang members or on a gang injunction.”<\/p>\n “Republicans in the House bipartisan immigration group are threatening to leave negotiations if they don\u2019t come to an agreement Thursday. Reps. John Carter of Texas and Raul Labrador of Idaho both separately said the time for negotiations is over,” Politico reports<\/a>.<\/p>\n “‘I think it\u2019s time for us to move ahead with a Republican plan if nothing happens tomorrow,’ Labrador said. He characterized such a plan as ‘conservative immigration reform.’ That the House\u2019s eight-person bipartisan group appears to be breaking down is a major development in the immigration debate. If the House does not come out with its own plan, it will make immigration reform a lot more difficult. The theory from Republican leadership was that the bipartisan group\u2019s product would give the House GOP buy-in.”<\/p>\n “Immigration will be the primary driver of population growth in the United States within a few decades, a milestone not seen in almost two centuries, the Census Bureau projected Wednesday. The Census Bureau said immigration will outstrip natural increase \u2014 the difference between births and deaths for the total population \u2014 by as early as 2027, but no later than 2038. The differing scenarios depend on how many immigrants continue coming to the U.S.” the Washington Post says<\/a>.<\/p>\n “Sen. Marco Rubio\u2019s office circulated a list this month of ways to toughen security in the immigration bill he helped negotiate, including potential amendments to cut down on chain migration, to require newly legal immigrants to show financial self-sufficiency and to build 700 miles of double-tier fencing along the border,” the Washington Times<\/a> says.<\/p>\n “Mr. Rubio\u2019s spokesman said the list was drafted by senior aide Alberto Martinez and was shared with some offices of senators who were interested in changing the bill. The list appears to be a debate that lays out problems some critics have raised and amendments that could be made to allay those concerns.”<\/p>\n “According to Chris Crane, the current president of the union for ICE agents, the National ICE Council, President Barack Obama, Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano, and ICE Director John Morton have all but abdicated their leadership in the enforcement of immigration laws and the protection of U.S. borders and citizens,” the Examiner writes.<\/p>\n “In a letter to Congress on May 9, Crane and a number of law enforcement executives complained that while business groups, activists, and other special interests were closely involved in the drafting of the proposed Schumer-Rubio immigration reform bill (S. 744), law enforcement personnel were excluded from those sessions.”<\/p>\n “In a recent NRO piece entitled \u201cSaul Alinsky and the Gang of Eight,\u201d I discussed how, if Schumer-Rubio becomes law, federal dollars devoted to \u201cimmigrant integration\u201d will pour into left-wing and Islamist activist groups to fund their own vision of that process. Now the 844-page bill has been replaced by an 867-page bill that makes the \u201cAlinsky section\u201d of the legislation even stronger,” says John Fonte at National Review.<\/p>\n “Apparently the senators wanted to make sure that leftist and Islamist advocacy organizations (CASA, La Raza, MALDEF, and CAIR and other Islamist groups) would not simply be grant recipients themselves, but would also be entrenched on the \u201cNew Immigrant Councils\u201d that will help guide strategy, funding, and implementation at the local level. One could guess why the four Democrats on the Gang of Eight wanted leftist and Islamist organizations with such ‘legal and advocacy’ experience in behalf of immigrants placed on the new immigrant councils, but why did the four Republicans agree to it?” Republicans in Secret House Amnesty Group Ready to Bolt<\/h3>\n
Immigration the Major Source of Population Growth<\/h3>\n
Rubio Amendment List Leaked<\/h3>\n
ICE Union Says Obama Administration Has Abdicated Enforcement<\/h3>\n
La Raza, Islamic Groups Will Get Tax Dollars Under Amnesty<\/h3>\n