{"id":4081,"date":"2013-07-02T16:24:53","date_gmt":"2013-07-02T20:24:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/live-immigrationreform.pantheonsite.io\/?p=4081"},"modified":"2018-12-28T15:50:50","modified_gmt":"2018-12-28T20:50:50","slug":"immigration-legislation-and-unemployment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/2013\/07\/02\/immigration-legislation-and-unemployment\/","title":{"rendered":"Immigration Legislation and Unemployment"},"content":{"rendered":"

At least some of the backers of the Senate\u2019s Gang of Eight amnesty and mass immigration bill seem to have bought the line that the legislation would be an economic stimulus. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) analysis of the bill projected that enactment would generate additional tax revenues resulting in a $197 billion reduction in the federal deficit during the first decade. This finding was touted by the White House and Senate leadership as a seal of approval on the legislation.<\/p>\n

But, that rosy forecast disappears when the details are examined. Most of the increased revenue in the CBO analysis results from increased flows to the Social Security Trust fund. Under amnesty, illegal aliens would be issued valid Social Security numbers. Both they and their employers would begin paying into the system. In addition, a large influx of new workers who enter would enter our labor force under the bill, either as immigrants or as guest workers would contribute to a temporary boon to the trust fund. That is funding that is not considered available for general budget programs.<\/p>\n

However, whether the newly legalized workers and new immigrants would benefit the economy would depend on whether they can find productive jobs. That issue is questionable in light of the CBO\u2019s estimate that one of the effects of the legislation would be to increase unemployment and lower wages. The CBO’s report on \u201cThe Economic Impact of S.744\u2026\u201d states on p.4, \u201c\u2026temporary imbalances in the skills and occupations demanded and supplied in the labor market, as well as other factors, would cause the unemployment rate to be slightly higher for several years than projected under current law.\u201d<\/p>\n

But, the current situation is already dismal. Neil Irwin, writing in the Washington Post<\/a> on the current state of the economy, provides statistical analysis that shows unemployment is still much higher than it was in 2008 before the recession. There are more than three unemployed job-seekers for every available job. And the share of the workforce that is employed remains much lower that it was in 2008. Irwin\u2019s data are the following:<\/p>\n