{"id":809,"date":"2011-11-18T14:28:16","date_gmt":"2011-11-18T18:28:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/live-immigrationreform.pantheonsite.io\/?p=809"},"modified":"2015-08-12T16:50:54","modified_gmt":"2015-08-12T20:50:54","slug":"sore-losers-administration-retaliating-against-alabama-for-winning-lawsuit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/2011\/11\/18\/sore-losers-administration-retaliating-against-alabama-for-winning-lawsuit\/","title":{"rendered":"Sore Losers: Administration Retaliating Against Alabama for Winning Lawsuit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Last month the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals handed the Obama administration a defeat, when it ruled that nearly all of Alabama\u2019s immigration enforcement law could go into effect. Rather than graciously accept the court\u2019s decision (in a lawsuit the administration itself initiated), the administration is using the Department of Justice (DOJ) to retaliate against Alabama. <\/p>\n<p>In an op-ed published on the <a href=\"http:\/\/townhall.com\/columnists\/iramehlman\/2011\/11\/17\/sore_losers_administration_retaliating_against_alabama_for_winning_immigration_lawsuit\" target=\"_blank\">Townhall website<\/a>, FAIR exposes the tactics that DOJ is using to prevent Alabama and other states from enforcing immigration laws the administration does not want enforced.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last month the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals handed the Obama administration a defeat, when it ruled that nearly all of Alabama\u2019s immigration enforcement law could go into effect. Rather than graciously accept the court\u2019s decision (in a lawsuit the administration itself initiated), the administration is using the Department of Justice (DOJ) to retaliate against<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/2011\/11\/18\/sore-losers-administration-retaliating-against-alabama-for-winning-lawsuit\/\" title=\"Read More\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[5,1513,6,4,10,7,14],"tags":[119],"yst_prominent_words":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/809"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=809"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/809\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":811,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/809\/revisions\/811"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=809"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=809"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=809"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=809"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}