![\"Golden_Fog,_San_Francisco\"](\"http:\/\/live-immigrationreform.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/Golden_Fog_San_Francisco-300x200.jpg\")
Some jurisdictions have sanctuary policies detailed in bills, ordinances or resolutions publicly available for review. Many, however, simply have longstanding police department practices of ignoring immigration status.<\/p>\nThey say the first stage for survivors of someone who has died is denial. Predictably, in the aftermath of Kathryn Steinle\u2019s murder at the hands of a previously deported illegal alien released because of San Francisco\u2019s lax policies, politicians nationwide are scrambling to deny why their particular jurisdictions don\u2019t fit neatly into the definition of a \u201csanctuary city,\u201d despite the fact they all are.<\/p>\n
Not that they\u2019re mourning for Kathryn Steinle; they\u2019re simply trying to weasel out of responsibility for what has become a dangerous public policy and an increasingly toxic label for cities.<\/p>\n
No single definition exists. Rather, sanctuary cities are loosely defined as municipalities that refuse to cooperate with federal immigration law enforcement efforts and\/or extend various benefits to illegal aliens, thus creating a welcoming environment. Policies fall into two categories. A \u201cdon\u2019t ask\u201d ordinance prohibits city workers from asking about a person\u2019s immigration status. A \u201cdon\u2019t tell\u201d policy prevents them from reporting a suspected illegal alien to immigration enforcement officials.<\/p>\n
Some jurisdictions have sanctuary policies detailed in bills, ordinances or resolutions publicly available for review. Many, however, simply have longstanding police department practices of ignoring immigration status.<\/p>\n
However, it’s not what they’re called or how city leaders choose to self-describe them that matter, it’s the policies they engage in that define them.<\/i> If local police elect not to inquire or act on immigration status at any point in the booking process or overtly ignore ICE detainers, they\u2019re a sanctuary jurisdiction.<\/p>\n
If the Administration, Congress and the courts had the will to stop them it could through the force of law \u2013 sanctuary policies are prohibited by Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act in 1996 – or by the power of the purse by withholding federal funds.\u00a0But the growth of sanctuary policies is driven by a top down example. The Obama Administration has neglected to secure the borders, dismantled most interior enforcement, granted backdoor amnesty to thousands of illegal aliens and released criminal aliens back onto the streets. The message has been sent; violating immigration laws is inconsequential so instead of trying to pick up the slack, San Francisco and hundreds of other jurisdictions across the country are just following Obama\u2019s example.<\/p>\n
Sanctuary city policies need to be reversed one-by-one, but come to think of it, we might now have a bigger problem:<\/p>\n
The whole country is a sanctuary for illegal aliens.