When it comes to immigration, the new budget compromise is not as bad as you think.
Facing the prospect of leaving Washington without an agreement on the looming debt-ceiling crisis, House and Senate leadership struck a deal with each other and President Trump that raises the spending limit by $320 billion and suspends the debt ceiling until 2021. This deal avoids nearly $1 trillion in automatic spending cuts, a feature of the Budget Control Act that Republicans forced President Obama to sign in 2011.
The agreement rests on two points. First, Republicans backed down from demanding deep spending cuts. Second, Democrats agreed to exclude any poison pills, controversial riders, and policy changes in appropriations bills unless both they, Republican leadership, and President Trump agree on them. For advocates of immigration enforcement, this is a huge win.
House Democrats, in their quest to dismantle and stymie President Trump’s immigration priorities, continually weaponize spending bills by offering amendments that target the administration’s efforts to secure the southern border and enforce existing immigration laws. The FY 2020 appropriations bill for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) included many examples of this. House Democrats successfully attached an amendment to that bill that would completely erase President Trump’s immigration actions since he took office.
Just this month, the House passed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) with multiple immigration riders that prevent detention of illegal aliens at military facilities and temporarily enshrine Obama-era amnesty programs. Last month, the House fought to pass an entirely partisan emergency border funding supplemental package with poison pills that placed burdensome restrictions on our immigration agencies. The House was forced to back down and pass a bipartisan Senate package.
If House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) stand by these concessions, advocates of immigration enforcement should be thrilled knowing that there can be no Democratic attempts to limit the federal government’s ability to enforce our immigration laws. Unless Democratic leadership could somehow convince Republican leadership and President Trump to agree to radical immigration proposals, the budget battles this September should be largely devoid of any immigration poison pills.
Fiscal hawks and progressive Democrats are unhappy with the deal. Hawks are upset with the spending increases and the president’s decision to not pursue deep cuts. Progressives are frustrated that they will be unable to use the budget to challenge President Trump’s immigration policies. For them, the budget deal is a loss. But for champions of border security, this is a positive development and a win going into the fall spending debates.
7 Comments
Are you effing kidding me???????????
“Democrats agreed to exclude any poison pills, controversial riders, and policy changes in appropriations bills”
Because demomuslims always keep their word, right???????????
With the recent Supreme Court decision that President Trump can transfer $2.5 billion dollars from the military budget to build the wall makes this a bad bill. The Federal spending and deficit must be reduced, this budget bill gives Democrats everything they wanted. Lets have some courage Republicans and do what is right for the American people!
With All the Money Congress Wastes
On Puerto Rico and such, you’d thing there would be funding set aside for a WALL.
Puerto Ricans are US citizens and serve in the military disproportionate to the likes of you, since WW 1.
We think it is long past time to give Puerto Rico their independence,
it is the right thing to do!
It’s great that something good comes out of this. Our defense budget is vastly overblown, throwing tens, even hundreds, of billions on weapons system that don’t work as planned and cost far more than promised and benefit mainly corporations. We could spend half what we do and still have the strongest military on earth by far. We also have too many politicians like Lindsey Graham and the late John McCain, who promote endless immigration and endless amnesties and endless wars. Our greatest weapon is our economic clout, and Trump understands that, unlike Obama who rewarded our enemies.
It may be that the Democrats have realized that the open borders tag is starting to stick. When you favor no detentions for border crossers, no deportations, and constant proposals for a “path to citizenship” for every illegal here longer than 15 minutes, it’s hard to see that position as anything but open borders.
Pingback: The Budget Deal is Actually a Win for Immigration Enforcement – The Importance of Business